Georgia Court of Appeals Holds that Doctor’s Interest in Outcome is Fair Game on Cross-Exam – Recent Health Law and Regulation Update Blog Post by Eric Frisch
Recent Health Law and Regulation Update Blog post by Eric Frisch.
The Georgia Court of Appeals has held that a doctor’s lien is fertile ground for cross-examination. In the case of Stephens v. Castano-Castano, the plaintiff sued for injuries arising out of a motor vehicle accident. The evidence showed that her attorney referred her to a treating physician who, in turn, treated her under the terms of a lien based on her recovery. Attempts at presuit settlement ultimately resulted in no settlement (and part of the decision deals with offers and acceptance), so a lawsuit was filed.
At trial, the defense sought to cross-examine the treating physician on the fact the attorney referred the plaintiff to him and his lien. Plaintiff moved to exclude the evidence, which was granted.
The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the trial court should have permitted the defense to cross-examine the doctor based on the financial interest. The Court wrote:
“Dr. Chappius’ financial interest in the outcome of the case is highly relevant to the issue of his credibility and potential bias, as Dr. Chappuis has become an investor of sorts in the lawsuit. If Castano receives a large verdict amount, then Dr. Chappuis has a near certain chance of fully and quickly recovering the costs of the treatment provided to Castano at no initial cost. On the other hand, if Castano does not recover at trial, Dr. Chappuis’ chances of being fully reimbursed are more doubtful. Thus, the expert witness has a financial motivation to testify favorably for Castano, and the probative value of this testimony outweighs its prejudicial effect.”
The Court rejected the notion that the attorney’s referral was fair game, however. In so ruling, the Court wrote that “[a]t most, there is a suggestion of unseemliness which creates a danger of unfair prejudice and confusion of the issues before the jury.”
The case is Stephens v. Castano-Castano, 2018 Ga. App. LEXIS 307.
To subscribe to our Health Law and Regulation Update Blog, please click here.